Archive for the ‘American Extremism’ category

On Civil Wars and Symbols

April 11th, 2010

Santa Cruz del Valle de los Caídos

If you take a bus ride from Madrid to El Escorial Palace, you will at some point see in the distance an enormous cross jutting 500 feet out from the valley like a scar across the sky. It is the largest cross in the world. It is the Valle de los Caídos, a monument built by Francisco Franco as a memorial to those Nationalists (pro-Franco) who died in the Spanish Civil War. His body now rests within the basillica below the cross. It was partially built with labor from Republican (anti-Franco) prisoners. Many died during its construction. And it remains a controversial and painful reminder of a terrible time in Spanish history.

The right-wing People’s Party has long held that the past should remain in the past. That there were atrocities on both sides and Franco was a complicated and maybe even ultimately necessary figure for the Spanish people. The left-wing PSOE (socialist party) which is now in power has, like many Spaniards, an uncomfortable feeling about what to do with this symbol of Nationalist victory. Certain symbols from that time are rarely seen anymore. The Spanish flag with the black eagle is rare while there remains supporters of the old Spain under Franco.

After the transition to democracy, there was a Pact of Forgetting that was felt to be the only way to move forward. It allowed past Nationalists to participate in the nascent democracy. Spain placed its eyes firmly forward and not to the past.

But ghosts refuse to stay silent. Mass graves have been found. Families want their relatives’ bodies returned. Judges have called for a review of past war crimes. The Socialist government has spoken of changing this Valley Cross to that of a memorial for Spain on its way to Democracy. While I lived there, the government removed the final statue of Franco, late in the dark of the night without notice.

But unlike South Africa and many other countries, there has not been a Truth and Reconciliation process; and that cross still divides.

Recently in the United States, governors of several southern states have declared Confederacy History months. In large parts of the south, it is not unusual to see the Confederate Flag flown. Many of these governors and southerners want to talk about the South and its role in the American Civil War as if that flag were not a symbol of treason and white supremacy. That it symbolizes a lifestyle that was divorced from its slavery. The Original Sin of the United States, the founding of this country as a slave owning country is part and parcel of the Civil War. Sadly, in both Spain and the US, religion is often connected hand in hand with these symbols.

That Confederate Flag will always be tied to slavery and the South. As slavery will always be tied to the South. The terrible Civil War that led to the deaths of 2% of all Americans at the time, and a 100 years of poverty and limited progress in the old Dixie slave states.

Right wing Americans go to pains to define that symbol as not a racist one; as something that beckons to a time that needs to be honored and commerated. Yet it is not surprising to note that the flag’s presence is more common when issues of racism are up and front in this country: during the civil rights battles of the 50s and 60s, some states added the Confederate Flag to their state flag; and now, when Northerners are prominent in the government and we are led by our first African-American president.

This flag is a wound on our country’s soul. I am frustrated to read its defense by politicians. Recently the governor of Mississipee said that the issue of slavery was not a major issue in the Civil War, joining his peer from Virginia.

When we talk of Confederacy History month, or of the “War of Northern Agression,” we are celebrating the darkest part of our National story. There is nothing to celebrate here. There is no way to detach this symbolism from its message of hate. There was no glorious past of this country that include slavery, Southern or Northern.

Perhaps it’s time for our own Truth and Reconcilation.

CBS Reports: The Homosexuals 1967

February 14th, 2010

Pretty fascinating stuff.  And as I have been watching it, I’m reminded that this was the environment of my early years.  I would have been about 8 years old at the time of this report.  I certainly already knew I was gay, though I probably used the term “homosexual” in that quasi-clinical way all the books of the time described it.  Everything I read or saw in those years described the perversion and unhappiness and loneliness that my life would lead to.

Of course, I have had times of unhappiness and loneliness in my life.  Who hasn’t?  Once I stopped trying to pray my gay away, and accepted who I was, I’ve been happy much more often than unhappy.  I’ve known much love in many of the forms it takes, long-term partners, shorter term intense sparks, and the love of friends and family.

Last night there was an all-male gay acepella group from Cal that was fierce in their gayness.  And someone next to me, of my age group, said to me:  God to be that comfortable at that young an age.  To experience love and heartbreak and knowledge of yourself at such a young age is so powerful.

We’ve come a long way.

President takes on the Democratic Party “Moderates”

February 4th, 2010

It was good to see the President point out the idiocy of Blanche Lincoln’s logic on where the Democratic agenda should be. This is the more feisty president I wanted, but probably shouldn’t have expected.

But there is a broader story there about how politics has been redefined by the Conservative movement and its media and religious allies.  Even good solid progressives in a city like San Francisco by into the idea of needing to play on the field that the Republicans have built.  This despite (still) huge advantages in majority positions in both houses of Congress.  The Democrats seem to not realize that part of the political process needs to be rebuilding that field.

This is something that is fascinating me more and more lately.  I’ve been having quick back forth conversations about it with Dave Caploe about this and have been reading his lectures and articles in the New York Times recently.  I’m going to continue down this road where it leads me intellectually, and politically share that experience here on this blog.  Hint: the radical left is for all intent a myth created by the right.  As I asked the other day, name me that last major progressive legislation passed through into law in this country.  Anything since Johnson?

So along with exploring my middle aged need to ascribe understanding to my own life experiences, I will also write more about why we have a nation have ended up where we are and why.  I’m just a simple fundraiser and executive, but we can all learn.  Heck, I didn’t learn to speak Spanish until I was nearly 50 years old.

And Mr. President, more of this please.

How does American News look Overseas

January 30th, 2010

I just thought this was pretty funny. This Charles Brooks guy has a bunch of videos on Youtube, well worth checking out.

And this is another take on general American television. The host wonders how it is that we Americans seem so friendly and laid back when we are surrounded by fear-based shows.

You really get the best feel for this when you travel a lot or live overseas for anytime at all. But check out his other videos on how to be a newsreporter and other subjects. Very funny.

Perspective

January 19th, 2010

Swinging around the web tonight, you’d think we had just overrode the US Constitution. We do need a little perspective. Martha Coakley was a terrible candidate. We should have won. Mr. Cosmo was incoherent on policy issues and yet he won. So be it. It’s not as if we really got a lot out of having 60 votes. Especially when those votes included Joe from Connecticut, among others.

The important thing is that we can not allow this to be spun as a repudiation of Obama, progressive policies, health care, or the Democratic agenda. We must keep pressure on the party to pass the damned health care bill, job stimulus legislation, and of course LGBT rights issues.  It’s going to be harder now.  Maybe in the end that will be good.  As you may know, I’m not a fan of either party.  My political beliefs don’t have any political party in this country.  But, yikes, we got to keep on fighting.

What we do need is for the Democratic Party to seriously work at passing its agenda. Use reconciliation if you need to. Play every damned trick the Fox/Republican party has used. These are seriously crazy people. We should not be losing to them. We should fight them every step of the way.

The Case for Gay Marriage

January 12th, 2010

I’m beat down tired, but so impressed with the trial so far in San Francisco on the Federal Challenge to Prop 8.  I’ll have more to say, but let me share this with you:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Stunning Development from Supreme Court

January 11th, 2010

Yes, I am being sarcastic. To no one’s surprise the Supreme Court has stayed the order to post delayed court proceedings on youtube. The possible retribution to those bigots may be too great a burden for this once great country to bare.

This whole trial has always scared me. Yes, the facts are on our side, the Constitution is on our side, precedent is on our side, and the American Exceptionalism is on our side. Yet, the bigots hold a lot of power.

President Obama has stayed silent. The Court is stacked against us. This is not a legal issue, but a political issue in practice. Can you imagine President Obama doing what Eisenhower, Truman, Kennedy, or Johnson did to uphold the rule of law? The administration is already ignoring court orders to give spousal benefits to a government employee. Just ignoring it. Yikes.

I’m Mr. Grumpy today.

The Anti-Marriage Closet

January 10th, 2010

Coming off of a decade where up is down and down is up when it comes to the truth and conservatives, the fight over cameras in the hearing tomorrow on the Constitutionality of the Prop 8 vote also turns history on its head.  For years, LGBT people have lived in the closet.  There were of course many reasons for this.  Many of us felt shame over a life that was vilified by our communities.  But the largest part of life in the closet was fear.  It certainly was for me.  Fear of losing our jobs, of losing our family and friends, of violence and ridicule.

In the great Julianne Moore move “Far from Heaven,” we glimpsed scenes of the dark and frightened corners of a closeted gay man in the 50s.

My, have the times changed.  Now those opposed to equality wish to make their statements in the dark, without the light of a camera recording their statements.  They say that they are frightened by potential retribution for their opinions.  They are ashamed and afraid.  The gay men and lesbians are those fighting to speak in the full view of the public.

The federal judge has ruled for cameras in the courtroom.  It is being appealed to the US Supreme Court by those opposed to equality.  The question for us is does a gay person have any hope in this country for help by the courts; by the US Supreme Court in particular.

That those on the anti-marriage side have few arguments other than their God says its wrong and most people don’t like it, only demonstrates the bankruptcy of their fight.  Popular hatred is not a public policy.  And the light of day needs to shine on the truth.

McCain’s campaign manager takes on Palin

January 10th, 2010

I know everyone says that the Democratic party is in big trouble in the upcoming 2010 elections, but this sort of in-fighting on the Republican side, as well as the crazy tea-party movement is very underreported.

A couple of interesting articles about the US v the world

January 7th, 2010

The first article is basically a response to the always frustrating New York Times columnist Ross Douthat’s recent statements about the relative strengths of the American capitalism system to the more European Social Democratic model used in nearly all of the original and 1982 expanded EU.  There really are no “socialist” countries in Europe despite what the Repubs will tell you.  Social Democrats are capitalistic countries that believe in regulated capitalism and a significant social safety net.  Gee, sounds good to me.  And from experience, it seems to work well.  But Ross opines:

Social democracy has its benefits, but global competitiveness isn’t one of them. As Jim Manzi points out, in an essay on “Keeping America’s Edge” in the latest issue of National Affairs, “from 1980 through today, America’s share of global output has been constant at about 21 percent. Europe’s share, meanwhile, has been collapsing in the face of global competition — going from a little less than 40 percent of global production in the 1970s to about 25 percent today.”

The always interesting Matthew Yglesias responds:

Jon Chait, for his new blog, delves in deeper and discovers a few salient points. One, Manzi is comparing US economic performance since 1980 to European performance since 1973—which is nuts. Two, Manzi is defining “Europe since 1973″ to include the Soviet Union and sundry Central European countries that spent half that period in the Communist bloc:

So, let’s look at a straight-up measure. How did the United States perform in comparison with European social democracies? Well, since 1980, the original 15 members of the European Union saw their real per capita income grow by 58%. Real per capita GDP in the United States grew by… 63%. And that measure actually overstates the difference. The European Union does not include Switzerland, Norway or Iceland — three countries that clearly qualify as European social democracies. Those three countries had 71% growth in per capita GDP since 1980 — thanks to Isha Vij of the Center for American Progress for pointing this out to me — which, if added to the EU 15, would bring the growth record of the United States and the social democracies even closer to parity.

Even more interesting to me is that though the US and the EU are pretty much at parity a key difference is the distribution of a county’s wealth.  In Europe you will find far fewer very wealthy people and far fewer very poor people.  So the difference is really in the distribution of wealth and a philosophy about how a society cares for its citizens.

Over the last 30 years in the United States, we have been indoctrinated by media, pundits, the Republican party and others that only our system creates wealth.  Closer to the truth is that we are unique in how we distribute that wealth among our people.  Rarely in Europe would you find an executive making more than say 8 times their lowest paid employee.  In the US private sector, we see orders of magnitude above this.  But we are so sure that no other system works, that the mere mention of a “European” system can kill any progress here in the US.  And the Dems are as much to blame as the Repubs.  Democrats constantly live looking over their shoulder in fear of being called socialist or a dove on foriegn policy.

We could use a little bit of adult behavior.

The other fascinating article is by one of my favorite writers, James Fallows, who has an interesting take on returning to the US after 3 years of living in China.  I can say that after my time living overseas, I have been struck by several things:  the amount of poverty apparent everywhere, the dirt of the city, the number of mentally ill people on the streets, and vast disparity of those with money and those without.  Read the whole article, its a great read.