Archive for the ‘politics’ category

On Civil Wars and Symbols

April 11th, 2010

Santa Cruz del Valle de los Caídos

If you take a bus ride from Madrid to El Escorial Palace, you will at some point see in the distance an enormous cross jutting 500 feet out from the valley like a scar across the sky. It is the largest cross in the world. It is the Valle de los Caídos, a monument built by Francisco Franco as a memorial to those Nationalists (pro-Franco) who died in the Spanish Civil War. His body now rests within the basillica below the cross. It was partially built with labor from Republican (anti-Franco) prisoners. Many died during its construction. And it remains a controversial and painful reminder of a terrible time in Spanish history.

The right-wing People’s Party has long held that the past should remain in the past. That there were atrocities on both sides and Franco was a complicated and maybe even ultimately necessary figure for the Spanish people. The left-wing PSOE (socialist party) which is now in power has, like many Spaniards, an uncomfortable feeling about what to do with this symbol of Nationalist victory. Certain symbols from that time are rarely seen anymore. The Spanish flag with the black eagle is rare while there remains supporters of the old Spain under Franco.

After the transition to democracy, there was a Pact of Forgetting that was felt to be the only way to move forward. It allowed past Nationalists to participate in the nascent democracy. Spain placed its eyes firmly forward and not to the past.

But ghosts refuse to stay silent. Mass graves have been found. Families want their relatives’ bodies returned. Judges have called for a review of past war crimes. The Socialist government has spoken of changing this Valley Cross to that of a memorial for Spain on its way to Democracy. While I lived there, the government removed the final statue of Franco, late in the dark of the night without notice.

But unlike South Africa and many other countries, there has not been a Truth and Reconciliation process; and that cross still divides.

Recently in the United States, governors of several southern states have declared Confederacy History months. In large parts of the south, it is not unusual to see the Confederate Flag flown. Many of these governors and southerners want to talk about the South and its role in the American Civil War as if that flag were not a symbol of treason and white supremacy. That it symbolizes a lifestyle that was divorced from its slavery. The Original Sin of the United States, the founding of this country as a slave owning country is part and parcel of the Civil War. Sadly, in both Spain and the US, religion is often connected hand in hand with these symbols.

That Confederate Flag will always be tied to slavery and the South. As slavery will always be tied to the South. The terrible Civil War that led to the deaths of 2% of all Americans at the time, and a 100 years of poverty and limited progress in the old Dixie slave states.

Right wing Americans go to pains to define that symbol as not a racist one; as something that beckons to a time that needs to be honored and commerated. Yet it is not surprising to note that the flag’s presence is more common when issues of racism are up and front in this country: during the civil rights battles of the 50s and 60s, some states added the Confederate Flag to their state flag; and now, when Northerners are prominent in the government and we are led by our first African-American president.

This flag is a wound on our country’s soul. I am frustrated to read its defense by politicians. Recently the governor of Mississipee said that the issue of slavery was not a major issue in the Civil War, joining his peer from Virginia.

When we talk of Confederacy History month, or of the “War of Northern Agression,” we are celebrating the darkest part of our National story. There is nothing to celebrate here. There is no way to detach this symbolism from its message of hate. There was no glorious past of this country that include slavery, Southern or Northern.

Perhaps it’s time for our own Truth and Reconcilation.

Good line by MoDo in the Times: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tat

February 4th, 2010

In response to a GOP senator’s concern that the repeal of DADT might lead to horrible other things:

Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia said that if they began to loosen one restriction, others might unravel, leading to a louche atmosphere brimming with “alcohol use, adultery, fraternization and body art.” Don’t ask, don’t tat.

Still, one of the most remarkable speeches ever given

February 4th, 2010

This speech by Premier Zapatero in the Spanish Cortes is one of the most remarkable speeches I have ever heard by a straight politician in a legal setting. This was the day same-sex marriage was legalized in Spain. I remember years later having dinner with many of the leaders of the LGBT movement in Spain and one of them said to me:

He said he would do it, and he did it.  That’s why we love him

Always pretty remarkable when that happens.

President takes on the Democratic Party “Moderates”

February 4th, 2010

It was good to see the President point out the idiocy of Blanche Lincoln’s logic on where the Democratic agenda should be. This is the more feisty president I wanted, but probably shouldn’t have expected.

But there is a broader story there about how politics has been redefined by the Conservative movement and its media and religious allies.  Even good solid progressives in a city like San Francisco by into the idea of needing to play on the field that the Republicans have built.  This despite (still) huge advantages in majority positions in both houses of Congress.  The Democrats seem to not realize that part of the political process needs to be rebuilding that field.

This is something that is fascinating me more and more lately.  I’ve been having quick back forth conversations about it with Dave Caploe about this and have been reading his lectures and articles in the New York Times recently.  I’m going to continue down this road where it leads me intellectually, and politically share that experience here on this blog.  Hint: the radical left is for all intent a myth created by the right.  As I asked the other day, name me that last major progressive legislation passed through into law in this country.  Anything since Johnson?

So along with exploring my middle aged need to ascribe understanding to my own life experiences, I will also write more about why we have a nation have ended up where we are and why.  I’m just a simple fundraiser and executive, but we can all learn.  Heck, I didn’t learn to speak Spanish until I was nearly 50 years old.

And Mr. President, more of this please.

OK. I may have misjudged…

February 4th, 2010

I have been beyond frustrated with the President’s slow progress on the DADT and other LGBT issues. Frankly, a lot of what he has done is far too “center-right” in its policy tone for me. But that’s a different blog entry. For now, all credit is due the President. I believe he has handled a complicated management and policy problem (not to mention political problem) in a way I actually find I work myself. He has lined up as many ducks in a row as he can and has put the Republicans in a very tight place. Republican after republican have stated in the past that they would defer to the military’s opinion on DADT.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said in October 2009 that for a reversal of DADT to be successful, there would have to be a “buy-in by the military.”

“They should be included in this,” said Graham. “I am open-minded to what the military may suggest, but I can tell you, I’m not going to make policy based on a campaign rally.”

Former Massachusetts governor and presidential candidate Mitt Romney in a November 2007 debate was asked if he looked forward to “a day when gays can serve openly in the military?”

“I look forward to hearing from the military exactly what they believe is the right way to have the right kind of cohesion and support in our troops and I listen to what they have to say,” he replied.

In another Republican presidential debate a month later, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee joined Romney in insisting that the country needed to hear first from military command.

“I probably would let the military make that decision,” he said, when pressed. “One thing I don’t think you need is a president who’s trying to tell the military how to run the military, other than set broad policy agenda. The Uniform Code of Military Conduct is the best way to handle that and I would leave it to — to those who run the military.”

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okl.) has insisted, as recently as 2009, that he would “defer in large part to our military leaders on matters of military readiness and code of conduct. This includes the impact changing the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy would have, especially since military leaders note that this issue is fundamentally about military readiness.”

In a 2008 interview, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) defended DADT as a sound military policy by arguing that he had not “sensed that the military is calling for a change.”

Any change to these sorts of comments will again show the blunt bigotry that truly lies behind these men.

I truly don’t believe that this can be done overnight.  I think a year is reasonable.  My fear was always that the President would not do anything on this at all.  It now appears he may have been doing quite a lot.  Recently joining in with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is now the former man that held that position; a man who helped to draft this policy:  Collin Powell.

So Mr. President, when I’m wrong, I’m wrong.  So far on this, I am feeling a lot better.  Now about that other stuff…oh, just let well enough alone, Lynch.

Pre-SOTU thoughts

January 27th, 2010

I have been an enthusiastic supporter of the President while he was campaigning. My problem with him since then is that he doesn’t appear to be the same person. We as progressives deal in a media environment in which the assumption is that we are a conservative country. This despite much evidence to the contrary. And there is some evidence that the GOP is misreading the public in this way again. Mike Lillis via Andrew Sullivan:

But while Republicans are hoping Brown’s victory foreshadows a GOP landslide, a number of political experts are warning that the country’s restless anxiety — as evidenced not only in Massachusetts, but in Virginia, New Jersey, and now Florida as well — is less a backlash against Democrats in particular than a rebuke of the business-as-usual politics of Capitol Hill in general. Even as unemployment soared and housing markets tanked, voters have watched lawmakers bicker endlessly over a stimulus bill that proved too small and a health reform proposal that remains unfinished. Meanwhile, the banks have bounced back on the wings of a taxpayer bailout, paying out billions of dollars in employee bonuses this month while the jobs crisis outside Wall Street only worsens. In such an environment, some experts caution, incumbents on both sides of the aisle could find themselves surprisingly vulnerable in November.

I have no doubt that he will give a stemwinder of a speech.  I’m just not sure what he really stands for anymore.  I want to see him fight.  He will bring up again a call to end DADT, but we’ve heard this before.  He will announce some spending freezes.  He is beginning to play more and more on the conservative side of the field.  I hope we see a change in this.  Not just from the speech, but from his actions.

I’m still bewildered by the Democratic Party’s inability to pass anything progressive or within a fairly centrist Democratic Party agenda.  We shouldn’t go Bill Clinton’s way.  No small ball.  The country needs more.

As an aside, can anyone tell me the last major piece of progressive/liberal legislation that has been passed in the country.

Perspective

January 19th, 2010

Swinging around the web tonight, you’d think we had just overrode the US Constitution. We do need a little perspective. Martha Coakley was a terrible candidate. We should have won. Mr. Cosmo was incoherent on policy issues and yet he won. So be it. It’s not as if we really got a lot out of having 60 votes. Especially when those votes included Joe from Connecticut, among others.

The important thing is that we can not allow this to be spun as a repudiation of Obama, progressive policies, health care, or the Democratic agenda. We must keep pressure on the party to pass the damned health care bill, job stimulus legislation, and of course LGBT rights issues.  It’s going to be harder now.  Maybe in the end that will be good.  As you may know, I’m not a fan of either party.  My political beliefs don’t have any political party in this country.  But, yikes, we got to keep on fighting.

What we do need is for the Democratic Party to seriously work at passing its agenda. Use reconciliation if you need to. Play every damned trick the Fox/Republican party has used. These are seriously crazy people. We should not be losing to them. We should fight them every step of the way.

The Coakley Blues in the Bay State

January 18th, 2010

I have no idea what is going to happen in tomorrow’s special election to replace the seat once held by Ted Kennedy.  I don’t watch CNN, MSNBC, or Fox any more; I had found my general sanity had become more and more at stake.  But if you were to read the blogs and watch the network news, this is a forgone conclusion.  The Democrats are screwed.  It’s impossible to know from those sources what to take.  The cliche of course is that any news, good or bad, is always bad news for the Democrats as far as the media is concerned.  The news loves a story, and this would be a huge story.  It would be spun as a repudiation of Obama and health care and the end of the democratic party agenda.  That assumes it has had a coherent agenda, but you get my point.

The Repubs are energized to vote in Mass. and the Democrats are not.  That will be the tale.  If Coakley loses, a lot of recrimination will come about the time we’ve waisted trying to get bipartisan support for a health bill, and our lack of willingness to fight for anything.  It’s pretty known that I’m a bit down on the first year of the Obama presidency.  But the biggest fear I carry now is that the Blue Dog Dems will read a Bay State loss as vindication for their view that we’ve gone to far to the left.  I can’t for the life of me name one single left wing policy that we’ve passed except for the stimulus package as a Keynesian response to a tragic economic environment.  Our final health care bill is a pretty market friendly conservative bill that has some good things about it.

But here’s to hoping that the media is doing what they often do, build a story that really isn’t there.  Remember the Teabagger dude in upstate New York?  Didn’t win, did he?  In the end, we’ll know what we know tomorrow.  And don’t let anyone tell you the know what’s happening and what it all means.

Post script:  I mentioned yesterday the lovely comment that one of Republican Scott Brown’s supporters used in a rally (“let’s shove a curling iron up her ass”).  I just felt compelled to remind people of a bit of Scott Browns past and perhaps hanging out with people calling for rape isn’t a great idea when you’ve posed for this: (for real, him, years ago)

The Case for Gay Marriage

January 12th, 2010

I’m beat down tired, but so impressed with the trial so far in San Francisco on the Federal Challenge to Prop 8.  I’ll have more to say, but let me share this with you:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Excellent Site to follow the day to day coverage of the Prop 8 coverage.

January 11th, 2010

I’ve deeply moved by the strength, intelligence and passion of our former opponent on the conservative side, Mr Olson.  It helps me to remember that not all conservatives are anti-human rights.  And that in this case, at least one is bringing all he can for truth.  I have hope at least that a cogent argument is being made.  And though we may lose, the courts are not our friends, today, I cry in the joy of hearing our lives described in the mundane and common Americanism that we all represent.

via http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/11/liveblogging-day-1-daily-summary/.